Peanut Inspector Certification Practice Exam

What must be done if there is a significant difference between the first and second inspection results?

1. A third sample must be drawn

2. Request a re-inspection

3. Accept the first inspection

4. Consult a supervisor

The correct answer is: A third sample must be drawn

In the context of peanut inspection, when there is a significant difference between the results of the first and second inspections, drawing a third sample is crucial to ensure accuracy and reliability in the assessment. The process reflects an established protocol aimed at minimizing the potential for errors and ensuring that the findings are consistent and valid. By conducting a third inspection, inspectors can gather additional data that might clarify the discrepancies between the earlier results. This approach not only reinforces the integrity of the inspection process but also protects the interests of both producers and consumers by ensuring that the final decision is based on a comprehensive evaluation. The third sampling allows for further verification, potentially resolving any variances found in the initial inspections, leading to a more consistent and conclusive outcome. It is a standard practice that reflects due diligence in quality assurance in the peanut inspection process.